Loading…
Loading…
Not a diagram. A working process that runs on Monday morning whether or not anyone remembers it, with alerts when it breaks and an off switch when you want one.
These are the jobs that are frequent, repetitive and expensive to get wrong, which is usually what makes them the right place to start.
Frequency matters more than complexity. A boring task you do forty times a week is worth more than a clever one you do twice a year.
And one it is not. We would rather be specific than enthusiastic.
A voice note on the drive back becomes a job sheet. A rambling email becomes a record with the right fields filled. A pile of receipts becomes bookkeeping lines. The least glamorous use and by far the most reliable.
Quotes, replies, proposals, job ads, product descriptions, social posts. It gets you to eighty per cent in seconds; you supply the judgement and the send button. Real saving, near-zero risk.
Your price list, your policies, your past quotes, your specs. An assistant your team can ask instead of interrupting the one person who knows. It cites where the answer came from, so it can be checked.
And the one it is not: anything where being confidently wrong costs you money or trust. Final pricing, legal or tax advice, and anything that reaches a customer unreviewed. We build those as draft-and-approve, every time.
Agreed before anything is built, so there is no argument about scope afterwards.
Failures announce themselves. Silent automation is worse than no automation.
A short session in plain language, plus notes anyone can follow — including how to pause it.
Built under your own logins. Revoke our access and everything keeps working.
Being sold something you did not need is how most people got burned last time.
Everything is built inside your own accounts, under your own logins, and you can revoke our access at any time. We will tell you plainly which third parties touch your data and what they do with it, and we keep personal information out of general-purpose AI tools unless there is a proper arrangement in place for it.
Only if you explicitly ask for that, and we will push back. The default we build is draft-and-approve: the system prepares the reply, quote or summary, and a human presses send. The exception is factual acknowledgements — "we have got your enquiry, here is what happens next" — which are safe to send automatically because they contain nothing that can be wrong.
It will, at some point — a supplier changes an interface, someone renames a field, a password expires. Every build includes error alerting, so a failure is visible within minutes instead of being discovered by an annoyed customer three weeks later. On a care plan we fix it. Without one, you still get the documentation and the alerts, so at least you know.
Almost never. We start from the tools you already use and already pay for. Replacing a system is expensive, slow and risky, and it is usually not what is actually wrong. If we do recommend a change it will be one system, and we will tell you exactly why.
Everything is built in your own accounts, under your own logins, so you keep control and can revoke our access at any time. We will tell you plainly which third parties touch your data and what they do with it, and we keep personal information out of general-purpose AI tools unless there is a proper arrangement for it. There is a whole page on this if you want the detail.
Very common, and usually one of a short list of reasons: the process was broken before it was automated, nobody owned it afterwards, or it failed silently and got switched off. Those are design failures rather than technology failures, and they are the specific things our process is built to avoid.