Loading…
Loading…
Built for sole practitioners, small practices and bookkeeping firms across Gippsland and the Mornington Peninsula. If your team spends BAS week chasing receipts and typing numbers into your practice management system by hand, that's the problem we solve.
Practices don't lose money on the tax work itself. They lose it on everything around the tax work — the chasing, the re-typing, the same client question answered for the fifth time.
If three or more of these are true, there is a straightforward first project in here.
Frequent, repetitive and expensive to get wrong — in that order.
When a client hasn't sent through a signed engagement letter, an authority form or requested source documents, the system sends a polite reminder on a schedule you set, and tells your team who's still outstanding without anyone having to keep a spreadsheet of it. It stops chasing the moment the document lands, so nobody gets a reminder for something they've already sent.
Receipts, invoices and statements get read and turned into structured line items — dates, amounts, suppliers — ready for a bookkeeper to check and post, rather than typed from scratch. This doesn't replace the review step; it removes the blank-page data entry so your team's time goes on checking figures, not retyping them.
A new client's details are entered once and flow into your practice management system, your document portal and your contact list together, instead of being typed in three times by three different people. It also builds a simple checklist so nothing gets missed on the way in — engagement letter, ID checks, initial data requests.
Nothing we build sends anything to a client or to the ATO without a qualified person reading it first. Automation in a practice like yours belongs in the admin layer — chasing documents, moving data into the right place, answering routine questions — never in the judgement calls that a registered agent has to make. We also won't build anything that quietly bypasses your existing compliance checks or record-keeping obligations; if a workflow would need you to skip a step you currently rely on, we'll say so rather than build it. You should always be able to explain, in plain terms, exactly what a given automation does and doesn't touch.
Related reading: AI for accountants and bookkeepers: what is actually working
Everything is built inside your own accounts, under your own logins, and you can revoke our access at any time. We will tell you plainly which third parties touch your data and what they do with it, and we keep personal information out of general-purpose AI tools unless there is a proper arrangement in place for it.
You will always know what is being built, what it costs and how to switch it off.
You describe a normal week. We listen for the parts that get done twice.
As it really happens, including the workarounds nobody admits to.
A written definition of done, a fixed price, tested on your real jobs.
Your team trained, documentation left behind, and a check-in a few weeks later.
No. What we build handles the mechanical parts — collecting documents, entering data, sending reminders — and leaves every figure, interpretation and lodgement decision with a qualified person. The aim is to give that person more time on the work that actually needs their judgement, not to remove them from it.
Any automation we build for a practice is scoped to move data between systems you already use and control, rather than storing sensitive financial information somewhere new. We'll talk through exactly where client data goes, who can see it, and how it fits with the privacy obligations your practice already has to meet, before anything goes live.
Smaller practices are often where this makes the biggest difference, because there's no spare person to absorb a busy BAS week. We'd start with the one or two things costing you the most hours, not a full system overhaul, and build from there only if it's worth it.
We build these as tools your team can see into and explain, not black boxes, and we test them against a real busy period before you rely on them for one. If something does go wrong, the fallback is always the manual process you were already using, so a hiccup in the automation never stops the actual work getting done.
Twenty minutes, no slides, no obligation. Worst case you get a clear opinion on whether it is worth doing at all.