Loading…
Loading…
Built for committees, sporting clubs, progress associations and small not-for-profits across Gippsland and the Mornington Peninsula, run by volunteers giving up their evenings. If membership, rosters and grant paperwork are eating that time, that's what we're here for.
Community organisations don't run out of goodwill. They run out of the hours a handful of volunteers have to give, and too many of those hours go on admin that a small bit of automation could quietly absorb.
If three or more of these are true, there is a straightforward first project in here.
Frequent, repetitive and expensive to get wrong — in that order.
Members go into a single, simple list that the committee shares, instead of living across personal phones and inboxes. When someone renews or updates their details, it updates in the one place everyone can see, so the next secretary isn't starting from scratch.
A roster goes out to your volunteer list with the shifts that need covering, people can claim a slot themselves, and the committee sees what's still open at a glance instead of running a group text. It's built to be simple enough that whoever's running it next year can still use it without training.
Spending against a grant gets logged as it happens rather than reconstructed under deadline pressure, so writing the acquittal report is mostly checking a record that already exists. The same running record makes the next grant application faster too, because last year's numbers are already there.
A volunteer committee doesn't need enterprise software, and we won't sell you any. Everything here should be simple enough that whoever takes over as secretary or treasurer next year can pick it up without training, because committee turnover, not lack of ambition, is the real risk in most groups like yours. The single biggest failure point we see isn't a bad system — it's continuity: logins sitting in a former treasurer's personal email, a spreadsheet only one person understood, a grant record that left with the person who kept it. We'd rather build you something smaller that survives a handover than something impressive that doesn't.
Related reading: More done with the volunteers you already have
Everything is built inside your own accounts, under your own logins, and you can revoke our access at any time. We will tell you plainly which third parties touch your data and what they do with it, and we keep personal information out of general-purpose AI tools unless there is a proper arrangement in place for it.
You will always know what is being built, what it costs and how to switch it off.
You describe a normal week. We listen for the parts that get done twice.
As it really happens, including the workarounds nobody admits to.
A written definition of done, a fixed price, tested on your real jobs.
Your team trained, documentation left behind, and a check-in a few weeks later.
That's the exact situation this is built for. We look for the one or two things costing your committee the most volunteer hours and start there, using tools that are genuinely simple to run rather than expensive platforms built for organisations many times your size.
We build with handover in mind from the start — plain documentation, shared logins kept in one place the committee controls rather than one person's inbox, and systems simple enough for a new volunteer to pick up quickly. A proper handover pack is part of the job, not an afterthought.
It can take a lot of the friction out of it. Keeping a running record of your membership numbers, activities and spending means a grant application or acquittal report is mostly assembling information you already have, rather than reconstructing a year's worth of records under deadline pressure.
We keep member information in systems your committee actually controls, not scattered across personal devices, and we'll talk through who can see what before anything goes live. For a volunteer organisation, reducing the number of places sensitive information sits is itself a privacy improvement, not just a convenience one.
Twenty minutes, no slides, no obligation. Worst case you get a clear opinion on whether it is worth doing at all.