Loading…
Loading…
Builders, site managers and manufacturers lose margin to work that's done but never documented — variations, site diaries, subbie compliance paperwork and progress claims that pile up faster than anyone can type them.
Construction and manufacturing run on paper trails, and every one of them is a place profit quietly leaks out.
If three or more of these are true, there is a straightforward first project in here.
Frequent, repetitive and expensive to get wrong — in that order.
A quick note or photo logged from a phone becomes a timestamped variation record linked to the job, so the work is documented the day it happens instead of reconstructed from memory at invoicing time. It feeds straight into your progress claim instead of getting lost between the site and the office.
Insurance certificates, licences and SWMS documents are logged against expiry dates, with reminders sent before they lapse rather than discovered when a principal contractor asks. A subcontractor can't be scheduled onto a job if their documents have expired, without someone actively overriding it.
A short voice note or a few taps from site turns into a structured daily report — crew on site, weather, deliveries, delays — filed against the job automatically. It's still your record, written in your words; the tool just removes the retyping.
Safety and compliance documentation — SWMS, insurance certificates, licences, incident records — has to stay auditable and human-verified, so we'll build systems that track and flag these documents, not ones that approve or sign off on them. Anything mobile has to work for someone standing on site with one bar of signal and dirty hands, which rules out anything that needs a desktop or a long form to fill in. We also won't build anything that lets a job proceed on the assumption that paperwork is probably fine — if a document's missing, the system should say so plainly, not paper over it.
Related reading: How to write a process down so it can be automated
You will always know what is being built, what it costs and how to switch it off.
You describe a normal week. We listen for the parts that get done twice.
As it really happens, including the workarounds nobody admits to.
A written definition of done, a fixed price, tested on your real jobs.
Your team trained, documentation left behind, and a check-in a few weeks later.
Generally no — most builders have a system they're already using for scheduling, costing or estimating, and it makes more sense to connect to it than replace it. Where the fit's poor or the cost is out of reach, a custom internal tool can be a more affordable option, but we'd only suggest that after seeing what you're already using.
The aim is the opposite of hiding anything — automated variation and compliance records should be easier to produce on request, not harder, because they're logged as work happens rather than reconstructed afterwards. That said, the records are only as good as what's entered, so accurate logging on site still matters.
That's the design constraint we start from, not an afterthought. If capturing a variation or a diary entry takes more than a photo and a couple of taps, it won't get used on a real site, so we build for speed over completeness.
We design for offline-first capture where we can — data saved on the device and synced once there's signal — because plenty of sites and yards don't have reliable coverage. We'll talk through your specific sites before assuming a tool will just work.
Twenty minutes, no slides, no obligation. Worst case you get a clear opinion on whether it is worth doing at all.