Loading…
Loading…
Principals, conveyancers and paralegals lose hours each week to intake forms, ID verification chasing, matter opening checklists and settlement date juggling — admin that has nothing to do with legal skill and everything to do with keeping a file moving.
Conveyancing and litigation practices both run on deadlines and paperwork, and the sector loses real hours to admin that has nothing to do with legal judgement.
If three or more of these are true, there is a straightforward first project in here.
Frequent, repetitive and expensive to get wrong — in that order.
When an enquiry lands, the details are pulled into a structured intake form, a conflict check is triggered against your existing matter list, and a draft matter is opened in your practice management system with the right precedent checklist attached. A human still checks and confirms before anything is billed — the tool just stops the same fifteen minutes being repeated on every new file.
Key dates — settlement, finance approval, cooling-off — are pulled from the file and tracked in one place, with reminders sent to the right person as deadlines approach. If a date changes, everyone who needs telling gets an update automatically instead of relying on someone remembering to forward an email.
Your own past file notes, letters of advice and precedents become searchable in plain language, so have we dealt with an easement like this before returns an actual answer instead of a guess. Nothing is generated as new legal advice — it surfaces what your firm has already written so a lawyer can reuse and adapt it.
We will not build anything that generates legal advice or client-facing correspondence without a qualified person reviewing and approving it first — that line doesn't move, regardless of how capable a tool looks. Client confidentiality and legal professional privilege obligations apply exactly the same whether information sits in a filing cabinet or a database, so any system we build is scoped around what your firm is comfortable storing and where. We won't connect tools to client data without understanding your obligations under the Australian Privacy Principles and your professional conduct rules first. If a task genuinely requires legal judgement, we automate the paperwork around it, not the judgement itself.
Related reading: Australian privacy obligations in plain English
Everything is built inside your own accounts, under your own logins, and you can revoke our access at any time. We will tell you plainly which third parties touch your data and what they do with it, and we keep personal information out of general-purpose AI tools unless there is a proper arrangement in place for it.
You will always know what is being built, what it costs and how to switch it off.
You describe a normal week. We listen for the parts that get done twice.
As it really happens, including the workarounds nobody admits to.
A written definition of done, a fixed price, tested on your real jobs.
Your team trained, documentation left behind, and a check-in a few weeks later.
No. We build automations and tools that sit alongside your existing practice management system, not a replacement for it. Most firms have invested heavily in their current system and the trust accounting it handles, so our work generally connects to it and removes the manual steps around it rather than replacing it.
No, and we wouldn't build that even if asked. What we can do is make your own past advice and precedents easy to find and reuse, and automate the formatting and dispatch of documents once a solicitor has approved the content.
We treat any system touching client information as needing the same care as your existing file storage, and we'll talk through data handling, access controls and storage location before building anything. If a proposed automation would create a confidentiality or privilege risk, we'll say so rather than build it.
Not necessarily. A lot of what causes the most daily frustration — ID chasing, settlement date juggling, status update emails — happens just as often in a two-person practice as a twenty-person firm. We'd start with whichever single task is costing you the most time each week.
Twenty minutes, no slides, no obligation. Worst case you get a clear opinion on whether it is worth doing at all.